Because the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been reached, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Case legislation is specific to your jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For illustration, a ruling in a California appellate court would not ordinarily be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the discovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession on the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this facet for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Also, it could review an appeal of a decision for which it's got granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts When the Commission cannot get to a decision.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Obviously distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion consists of a shift to a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, delivers financial relief by inserting an employee inside of a higher spend scale, without shifting their task duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained during the same pay out scale for a protracted time, particularly when they deficiency opportunities for promotion. Upgradation can be a policy Software used to ease the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more
Most of the volumes (including more recent volumes than the library's holdings) may also be offered online through the Caselaw Access Project.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden provided to any reported judgment might count on the reputation of both the reporter plus the judges.[7]
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it really is easy to get a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation for making an attempt to get rid of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got reached to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it has achieved this kind of stage. Read more
In certain jurisdictions, case legislation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mildew the relief to really make it acceptable on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to the offender and also the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
Problems or Errors When you encounter any technical problems with this website (like a bad link or even a portion of the opinion lacking), please notify the eService read more Center.
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the figured out counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession on the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may possibly request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more